Senator Wendy Rogers has launched monthly bill to make bitcoin legal tender in the condition of Arizona
Willy Woo and Strategy B - Get All set for Enormous Rate Gains! View Resource read more
January 2008 - Ron Paul on seem revenue. Check out Resource read more
While the Fed insists that it will keep curiosity costs higher in 2023, the market expects U.S. inflation to proceed... read more
This the shit OG Bitcoiners have been ready for. Protocols constructed atop the lightning network that’ll 1 working day exchange... read more
CryptoCurrency’s split through into payments in Usa [Read details] Watch Resource read more
Bitcoin Mining Can make the Electrical power Grid Additional Dependable. Here is How That Is effective... Look... read more
aspiration of just about every Bitcoiner with fewer than 1btc Check out Supply read more
US Senate Prospect Bruce Fenton: Get the government out of the money business. We need to have to independent cash... read more
They are altering the way inflation is calculated once more to make points glimpse like they’re “not that bad” ... read more
[OC][Giveaway] Rework your household into a Hodlers universe. Produce a comment and receive a free CRYPTOTAG Hodl Gentle. We will... read more
Comments (11)
I always find this hard to understand. So legal tender means it’s recognized as money, but sellers don’t HAVE to accept it (ex: physical cash isn’t always accepted).
Further, is there a law that a seller can’t accept something that isn’t legal tender? Say a shitcoin?
[Here](https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/56leg/1R/bills/SB1239P.pdf) is the bill
What does it mean to introduce a bill? Is it a proposal that gets voted on by elected officials and made law if the vote is successful?
that definition of bitcoin is rather problematic, no?
Before you guys start blindly supporting a politician for throwing up window dressing.
[Wendy Rogers said white nationalists are ‘patriots’ and called for hanging political enemies](https://www.azmirror.com/2022/02/26/wendy-rogers-racist-white-nationalists-patriots-and-called-for-hanging-political-enemies/)
Somebody else from the state should purpose this bill.
Would that definition as written include spinoff shitcoins like bcash and BSV?
Senator…. Wendy’s? No, Roy Rogers.
Crazy how we went from all the doomsday nay-saying two weeks ago to possibly one of the strongest adoption measures yet
I would argue that the definition of “Bitcoin” in this law, is ambiguous. Seriously, there are like 25 or 30 spinoff hard fork cryptos from the original Bitcoin (BTC Cash, BTC SV, Bitcoin gold, etc.), and each of those would seem to meet the definition provided herein.
Anyways, yeah it’s bullish. Love to see this stuff.
It’ll prolly fail again. But it’s still great news it’s even considered. Seriously, that’s insane! BTC is adopting slowly but surely. It seems inevitable!
Slowly at first. Then all at once